Study Guide for Making Mr.
Right
1. CITATION
Making Mr. Right. Dir. Susan Seidelman. USA: Orion, 1987. John
Malkovich, Ann Magnuson, stars.
2. Brief description:
Pygmalion/Galatea motif with some gender reversal and other twists (possibly
including a sendup of male questing). Dr. Jeff Peters is a scientist who
makes an android who gets humanized by Frankie Stone-who, in turn, becomes more fully
human. Peters does not get fully humanized, but he does get a happy ending,
shot into space. Frankie Stone and the android (Ulysses) live happily ever
after?
3. MAJOR CAST
| Jeff Peters *, Ulysses: John Malkovich |
| Frankie Stone !: Ann Magnuson |
| Trish #: Glenne Headly |
| Estelle $: Polly Bergen |
| Sandy: Laurie Metcalf |
| Steve Marcus %: Ben Masters |
* Chief Robotic Engineer for Chemtec
! PR person
# F.S.'s friend
$ F.S.'s mother
% male pursuing F.S.
4. COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS:
- John Malkovich is the star of Mr. Right, but the character,
Frankie Stone, is the protagonist. Note opening of film and notice how
we know Stone will be important, and so will the relationship between
men and women.
- In the little movie we see at the meeting early in Mr. Right,
note the title for Jeff Peters: Chief Robotic Engineer. Since the
soundtrack of the commercial within the film makes clear that what's
being pitched is an android, the "Robotic" in the title becomes
ambiguous. How is "Dr. JEFF PETERS" a Chief and a "Robotic Engineer"?
Does he change during the course of the film? If so, does he become a
bit more human? More like a man?
- This movie is a comedy, and the traditional pattern of comedies
moves from relative unhappiness to happiness-for the positive central
characters. In Northrop Frye's analysis, central characters who aren't
positive and remain that way have to be circumvented or expelled (such
an expelled character is an alazon [plural, alazones]). Generally,
romantic comedy moves toward integrating as many people as possible into
a new, better, more flexible society, coalescing around a central
couple. How happy is the conclusion of Mr. Right? How
appropriate? How appropriate if the film examines a Ulysses character from
Penelope's point of view?
- According to Henri Bergson ("Comedy," ca. 1900), the essence of
comedy is "the superimposition of the mechanical upon the organic,"
specifically upon the human. How does Mr. Right use this
technique? How does it get comedy out making the mechanical more human?
- How does the film use voice-over announcements and intercut TV
shows and commercials? (Compare Robocop.)
- Given the men in this film, is there something to be said for a
woman's getting herself an android, or even a robot, and making Mr.
Right? Is the film an equal opportunity satire, getting us to laugh at
women also? How about American society, at least as typified by Miami,
Florida? (Note Ulysses as an "innocent abroad" in Miami, FL.)
- Joan Gordon and several other big-time feminist scholars of
science fiction once agreed that, if men erred in enjoying "T&A" films,
it was equally bad for women to enjoy films that let them lust after
men. "But what the hell; it's sexist but fun"-and she lead an extended
discussion of Mr. Right as a "C&B" flik (where the "B" stands for
"buns"). Is part of the attraction of the film for women (gay men?)
Malkovich's body-or at least for women intellectuals over 30? Is part
of the fantasy "making" Mr. Right?
- The film Metropolis makes much of "the male gaze" and both the
power of women (or female robot) and oppression of women (at least of
the saintly sort) through the male gaze. Is the male-gendered Ulysses
the object of the female gaze in a similar and/or different way?
- Making Mr. Right shows women interested in sex. Is this
aspect of the film Good for the Women (as a power minority
in patriarchal culture) or not? Is it good for women if the "cultural
dominant" is sexual puritanism and finds lust in one's heart as bad as
adultery? From the ancient world well into the Enlightenment, women were
held by many male intellectuals to be inferior and (and because)
women were sexually insatiable. In the 19th c., women were
better than men because far less interested in sex than the male
beast-and one of the reasons to keep women home and domestic and
carefully married was to protect women.