PSY 332 Child Development

Miami University

Cecilia Shore

Spring 2005

126D Benton

Meeting time TR  9:30-10:45 am

529-2401 shorec@muohio.edu

course website on http://blackboard.muohio.edu

 

 

Texts:  The Many Faces of Childhood: Diversity in Development.  Shore, C. (2004) Allyn & Bacon.

Additional readings on electronic reserve via www.lib.muohio.edu.  Password is psy332.

 

Course Description

            This course is an advanced course in child development.  It is expected that all students will have completed an introductory course in developmental psychology and, like all advanced courses in psychology, it is preferred that you have completed a course in statistics and research methodology.   It is the second course in a Miami Plan Thematic Sequences on Patterns in Human Development.  The purposes of the course are 1) to meet Miami Plan goals for liberal education,  2) to foster the growth of skills in extracting information from primary source literature, including a basic understanding of quantitative methods typical of developmental research,  3) to foster the growth of critical thinking skills in oral and written modes, thus strengthening your oral and written communication skills,  4) to introduce students to ways in which  psychologists formalize the idea of multiple determinants of development, including the notion of embedded systems, and 5) to help students understand the relationships among theories, methods, empirical findings, and practical applications of developmental research. 

For the Thematic Sequence on Patterns in Human Development:  This course is the second course in a thematic sequence on developmental psychology.  As human beings move through life, their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors change.  This sequence will focus on how and why we develop, and how psychologists investigate and explain changes in human behavior.  In previous courses, you were introduced to the range of psychological functioning, and to the issues and problems in studying how these change over time.  Now that you have begun to think about psychology from a developmental perspective, in this course we will focus on a particular segment of the lifespan—childhood. 

 

Plans for Meeting Course Objectives

            Thinking critically.  The discipline of developmental psychology aspires to scientific ideals of rigorous and systematic formulation of hypotheses which can be empirically evaluated.  Throughout the course, we will emphasize the cyclical relationship between theory and research.   In the context of a course in developmental psychology, the goal of critical thinking has several subgoals:  a) compare and contrast different theoretical approaches, b) derive testable hypotheses or empirical consequences of theory, c) understand research methodology, d) become familiar with quantitative methods used by the discipline, e) summarize available empirical evidence on issues, and f) draw appropriate theoretical conclusions from empirical evidence. 

            Exams will emphasize goals that go beyond knowing definitions and examples of terms.   As a consumer of information about child development, you will need to be able to understand argumentation methods including research methodology, evaluate empirical and other reasoned evidence and draw appropriate conclusions.  The “Final Portfolio: Critical Thinking about Social Issues” (described below) will allow you to practice these skills on real-world sample articles.    

 

            Understanding contexts.   The biosocial context has a pervasive influence on development.   Nature and nurture are inextricably intertwined.  Throughout the course, we will emphasize ways in which the physical and social environments affect development.  Social contexts include social categories such as culture, ethnicity and gender, as well as historical era.  And, of course, in development, age itself is a powerful context—it is related to many aspects of our physical abilities and resulting environment, as well as the social settings in which we participate (e.g., daycare vs. school).  A recurring theme of this course is the idea of multiple determinants of behavior—that is, some factors may influence behavior or development only in certain circumstances—another example of the influence of contexts.    

            Engaging with peers.   Each of you bring unique interests, experiences and backgrounds to this course, and consequently can offer a valuable perspective on development.  I hope that you will participate in small and large group discussions throughout the semester.  In addition, you will present to the class a brief summary of an article during one class period.  This may be done as part of a partnership with another student.   

            Reflecting and Acting.   The discipline of developmental psychology aspires to provide knowledge that will help serve the needs of children.   Throughout the course, we will indicate practical applications of the information we have gained about factors which influence developmental change.  The “Final Portfolio on Critical thinking on Social Issues” to be described below, is meant to help you focus on a controversial issue about factors that affect the welfare of children, and to take a reasoned position on this issue after evaluating information from both sides. 

 

Class Activities and Assignments

            Relationship between book and class period. Our own cognitive growth is best facilitated in a spirit of cooperation.  Each of us will benefit from the active involvement of others.  This involvement will require considerable preparation and willingness to engage ourselves thoughtfully with ideas presented both in the reading and other class members.  It is important that you read all the material carefully and thoughtfully in advance of the discussions on a given topic.  Discussion suffers if the participants are not prepared. “Preparation checks” will allow you to show that you have familiarized yourself in advance with the readings on upcoming topics.  

The textbook and class periods are complementary parts of a total learning experience for you.  The textbook provides background and details on a much wider scope than is possible during class time.   Class periods will focus on central issues from the text, sometimes by means of lecture but also through structured peer learning activities.  Exams will evaluate BOTH how well you have learned the breadth of information available in your text, and whether you have been actively involved in applying the concepts through class activities.

             Attendance and Preparation Checks.  In a discussion oriented class, your presence and involvement is critical.  The class discussion will suffer if students are not prepared by having familiarized themselves with the article.  In addition to the Overview and Focus questions in your book that accompany each article, additional Overview and Focus questions for articles not in the book will be posted on Blackboard website, listing learning objectives for you to focus on in each article. These questions are meant to help you summarize key ideas from the articles.   Each class period when there are readings due, you will be asked to bring with you to class a paragraph-length response (50-150 words) to ONE of the overview questions for EACH article assigned for that day. In other words, some days you will be writing two paragraphs (each 50-150 words), and others only one.  I strongly prefer that these be word-processed.  Since the purpose of the assignment is to be prepared for class discussion, NO LATE OR MAKE-UP PREP CHECKS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER. These will be graded simply as “satisfactory/unsatisfactory.”  Only 18 of these prep checks count in your grade (total 10% of your grade).  If you complete additional prep checks, you may earn up to 2% of your total course grade as extra credit.   As with all written work, these must be in your own words.

Final Portfolio: Critical Thinking about Social Issues.  The Critical Thinking about Social Issues portfolio is intended to help you practice skills in evaluating a secondary source about developmental psychology.  This assignment is meant to help you focus on a controversial issue about how factors affect the welfare of children.  Examples include:  should teachers ban superhero play by preschoolers?  You will be asked to summarize arguments from both sides and to take a position on this issue, both before and after class discussion on the topic.  Further details will be provided and posted on Blackboard.  You will be handing in components of this over the semester; the completed portfolio will serve as your final exam.  This assignment will be worth 10% of your total course grade.  Late policy: These papers will be accepted without penalty until 5:00 p.m. on the assigned day, but each day thereafter will be subject to an accumulating 10% penalty per day.  

            Article summary presentation.  Each of you will give a short presentation on one of the articles in the readings from electronic reserve.  See Presentation Guidelines that will be posted on Blackboard.  This may be done individually or as a team.  In all cases, when more than one student is assigned to an article, they must hand in on the day of their presentation, a written statement, signed by both of them about their division of labor (see details below).  This involves a written component and an oral component, equally weighted:

Written: You should plan to make a handout (no more than front and back of one page, 1” margins, single-spaced, no smaller than 10 point font) responding to the overview questions for your article.  YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR HANDOUT TO ME A WEEK IN ADVANCE OF YOUR PRESENTATION, SO THAT I CAN CHECK IT OVER FOR ACCURACY.  If you do not do so, or you do not make necessary changes before giving it to the class, you will lose all the points for preparing a handout.   If you hand it in late (after 5 pm of the day a week before your presentation) you will lose half of the points for the written component.  

Oral: Each person should plan to give a short (no more than 10 minutes) oral summary of the key points of the article, responding to the overview questions.  Your peers will evaluate the oral component, based on qualities such as organization, clarity, and responsiveness to class.  You do not have to write a prep check for the session(s) you facilitate.  If you (for documented reasons) are unable to come to class on the day of your presentation, you may make arrangements to present it later for half-credit.

Division of labor: If there is more than one student assigned to an article, on the day of the presentation, you must turn in a statement, signed by both of you, about your division of labor.  A number of arrangements are possible, e.g., 1) the team decides to divide the questions for the reading between them and each write and present half of them (since they are working independently, each will have a separate handout), or 2) the team agrees to each read the entire article, draft answers to all the questions, meet jointly to compare answers and decide which answers are best and how to revise (since they are working jointly, there will be one handout).  It is up to the team to decide what division of labor they will undertake, but you must present a description of it, and both students must assent in writing that they believe that this arrangement was equitable. 

            Exams.  There will be 3 in-class exams, each covering approximately one-third of the course material.  Exams will be equally weighted and will count for 70% of your course grade.   These will be closely related to issues highlighted by the overview and focus questions about the articles, but will also include materials, activities, and discussions in class.  Exams will be made up of a combination of formats, including, but not limited to: multiple choice, matching, fill-in-the-blank, true-false, graphing, crossword puzzles, and short-answer.  Sample exams will be made available.

            The handouts from peer presentations, and your own prep checks, will help support your review of the articles.  I will have checked them over for major inaccuracies, but minor ones may be inadvertently overlooked. Furthermore, they do not address the focus questions, and exam questions will address both focus and overview questions.  It is your responsibility to review the articles yourself in studying for the exam. 

            If for documented reasons you must miss an exam, you must contact me PRIOR to the exam to arrange a make-up.  All make-ups must be taken within 5 days of the scheduled exam. 

            Exam grades.  On each exam, the best two scores will be averaged. This average will be the top of the curve for that exam (provided that this average is at least 95% of the original points possible.  For example, if there were 50 questions possible on an exam, if  the best two scores were 48 and 49, their average is 48.5 (97% of the original total), so 48.5 will be the top of the curve.  If there were 50 questions possible and the best two scores were 45 and 46, their average is less than 47.5 (95% of the original), so 47.5 would serve as the top of the curve.  Your score is recorded as a percentage of the top of the curve for that exam.  Because the top of the curve is determined by the best performance of your peers, there will be no items thrown out from the exam.  If an item is bad, it will be missed by the best students and consequently not counted against you. 

Outside of class.  If you have questions or problems that are not answered in class, please come see me during office hours.  If you cannot come at that time, please make an appointment so that I will be able to set aside that time for you.  If you have a documented learning disability or other need for educational accommodations, please see me as soon as possible to discuss these.

 

            Overall course grades   Total grades will  be rounded to the nearest whole number and assigned according to the following scale:


A+  98-100

A    92-97

A-   90-91

B+   88-89

B     82-87

B-   80-81

C+ 78-79

C    72-77

C-   70-71

D+  68-69

D    62-67

D-   60-61

F      0-59


 

All aspects of this syllabus are subject to revision.  If changes are needed, they will be announced in class and posted on Blackboard.


Tentative schedule of reading.  Readings marked with  * are in textbook

Date

 

Unit/topic

Readings

 Due

Jan 11

Organization

 

 

Jan 13

Systems: Social structures beyond family

Bronfenbrenner: Ecological models of human development.

* Lerner: Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development

Prep check

Jan 18

 

*Clark: Rural children’s health

Prep check

Jan 20

 

*Gerstein: The changing face of bilingual education

*Cooper : Cultural Brokers

Prep check

Jan 25

Systems: Families as context

Walsh: Changing families in a changing world

Prep check

Jan 27

 

*Wang: Differences in child-rearing attitudes between immigrant Chinese mothers and Anglo-American mothers

Prep  check

Feb 1

 

Morelli & Rogoff: Cultural variation in infants’ sleeping arrangements

Prep check

Feb 3

 

* Mooney-Somers: Children of lesbian mothers

Prep check

Part 1 of portfolio due

Feb 8

 

*Hughes: Characteristics of maternal directiveness and responsiveness with young children with visual impairments

Prep check

Feb 10

 

 

Exam 1

Feb 15

Theory: Socioemotional tasks

Erikson: Eight stages of man

Prep check

Feb 17

 

Bowlby: The role of attachment in personality development

Prep check

 

Feb 22

 

Switch day, no class

 

Feb 24

Research: Socio-cultural factors affect socio-emotional tasks

*Zach: Patterns of the attachment-exploration balance of 1-year-old infants from the US and northern Germany

*Silin: The vicissitudes of adoption for parents and childen

Prep check Part 2 of portfolio due

Mar 1

 

*Berman: Children and War

*Sternberg: “Lost childhood: Lessons from the Holocaust

Prep check

Mar 3

 

*Wiley: Constucting autonomous selves through narrative practices

Prep check

Mar 8

Theory: Learning and development and social interaction

Piaget: Development and learning

Prep check

Mar 10

 

Vygotsky: Interaction between learning and development

Prep check

Part 3 of portfolio due

Mar 15-17

BREAK

 

 

Mar 22

 

Rogoff: Explanations of cognitive development through social interaction

Prep check

Mar 24

 

 

Exam 2

Mar 29

Research: Social context & cognition

* Coley: On the importance of comparative research: the case of folk biology

Prep check

Mar 31

 

Stigler: How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection

Prep check

Part 4 of portfolio due

Apr 5

 

Kearins: Visual-spatial memory in aboriginal and white Australian children

Prep check

Apr 7

 

*Finton: Living in a bilingual-bicultural family

Prep check

Apr 12

Resilience

Mussen: Carmichael’s manual sections on “Quantitative models” and “The organization of the growth process”

Prep check

Apr 14

 

*Rutter: Developmental catch-up and deficit following adoption after severe global early  privation

Prep check

Apr 19

 

*Ekwenye: Beggar children in Nigeria

Werner: Children of the garden island

Prep check

Apr 21

 

 

Exam 3

Apr 26

Wrap-up

Class discussion: Critical thinking about social issues

 

Apr 28

 

Wrap

 

Finals wk

 

Thursday May 5 at 5:00 pm.

Final portfolio due

 


 



Academic integrity

            Both Miami University and the Psychology department are dedicated to providing a learning environment based not only upon academic excellence but academic integrity as well.  In this course it is expected that you will adhere to all Miami University guidelines regarding academic misconduct.  (See part five of the Miami Student Handbook: Academic Misconduct for details on Miami’s policies.)  Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

·         Submitting work (tests, homework, papers, etc.) done for another course without gaining my approval.

·         Submitting the work of another (whether in part or in whole) as your own.

·         Possessing prohibited materials during a test or quiz.

·         Providing or receiving assistance from another student unless explicitly permitted to do so by the instructor.

Engaging in academic misconduct can result in penalties ranging from a minimum of an F on the assignment to an F in the course, an “AD” signifying academic dishonesty on your Miami transcripts, academic suspension, and expulsion from Miami University.  “Misunderstanding of the appropriate academic conduct will not be accepted as an excuse for academic misconduct” (Section 501, Student Handbook).  Please feel free to visit me during office hours if you would like any of the above policies clarified.  I also encourage you to meet with me if you suspect that another student in the course has engaged in academic misconduct. 

 

Classroom conduct

Everyone in a classroom is there for the purpose of learning, and no one should be able to deprive another person of the chance to learn. We collectively must take the responsibility for preserving an environment conducive to this common goal. 

·         Please do not come in late or leave early.

·         Be attentive and courteous during class. It is disruptive to engage in activities that are unrelated to the class or to hold side conversations with classmates while the professor (or another student who has the floor) is talking. It is also distracting to others if you eat during class—beverages are acceptable.

·         Cell phones, pagers and similar electronic devices should be turned off prior to the beginning of a class period and left off until after the professor has dismissed the class.

·         To request an exception to these policies on a specific occasion, see the instructor before class begins.

 

 Ground rules for discussion

·         In order to create a climate for open and honest dialogue and to encourage the broadest range of viewpoints, it is important for class participants to treat each other with respect.  Namecalling, accusations, verbal attacks, sarcasm, and other negative exchanges are counter productive to successful teaching and learning.  

·         Learning is both about sharing different views and actively listening to those with different views.  Students in this class are expected to do both.  Remember that it is OK to “agree to disagree” with each other. Learning is maximized when many different viewpoints are expressed in the classroom.

·         Keep the discussion and comments on the topic, not on the individual.  Don't personalize the dialogue. Students should try to raise questions and comments in way that will promote learning, rather than defensiveness and conflict in other students.

·         Everyone is expected to share.  If you are interested in a professional career, your job will require you to speak before groups of people—this is a good chance to begin learning oral communication skills.  All members of the class should be aware that we want to hear from everyone— please be patient, share the floor, and allow others to speak.  

 

Avoiding plagiarism

            Often the most difficult part of avoiding plagiarism is summarizing articles in your own words.   The following examples are meant to help you recognize plagiarized material, and suggest ways to avoid it.

Original passage (From Laura Berk’s article on Vygotsky’s theory, originally published in Young Children, Nov. 1994, pp. 30-39) :

            The Piagetian view, dominant for the past three decades, claims that make-believe emerges spontaneously when children become capable of representational thought.  Piaget and his followers assumed that children lack the cognitive competencies to share play symbols with others—both adults and peers—until well into the preschool period (e.g., Fein 1981).  Not until recently have researchers seriously addressed the social context of children’s play experiences.  Their findings challenge the notion that fantasy play is an unprompted phenomenon arising solely from tendencies within the child.  Instead, new evidence suggests that make-believe, like other higher mental functions, is the product of social collaboration. 

Plagiarized version, unacceptable:

            The Piagetian view has been dominant for over 30 years.  It claims that pretend play appears spontaneously when children achieve the ability to think representationally.  The Piagetian view is that, before children are well into the preschool years, they do not have the cognitive ability to share play symbols with others, adult or peer play partners.  However, new research findings challenge the notion that make-believe arises solely from tendencies within the child.  Instead, these researchers believe that fantasy play results from social collaboration. 

Notice that, essentially, this is the same paragraph as the original.  A few phrases have been re-arranged, some synonyms substituted for terms here and there, but basically it is unchanged.  In fact, some whole chunks of the original are retained without giving the author credit for them.  How can we avoid stealing an author’s work, and yet show that we understand the ideas s/he wanted to convey?  The simplest and most effective way to do this is to close the book!  As long as it is open in front of you, it will be hard not to be tempted by “oh, they said it so well—I couldn’t express it that clearly!”  If you are absolutely enchanted by a phrase in the original, e.g., “arises solely from tendencies within the child,” and wish to keep it in your summary, you MUST put quotation marks around it, and indicate the page in the original where it can be found.  You should always clearly say whose ideas these are by naming the author. 

Non-plagiarized version, acceptable:

            According to Berk, for many years, researchers followed the Piagetian belief that play depended primarily on cognitive abilities.  Over the preschool years, children would acquire the cognitive skills that would enable them to create and communicate about imaginary worlds.  Recently, however, researchers have come to recognize the importance of social interaction in supporting the development of make-believe play.

 For more information about avoiding plagiarism, please see the online resources from the Center for Writing Excellence: http://www.units.muohio.edu/cwe/Online_Resources.html