Capstone
PSY 410: Internal Multiplicity, Dialogue, and
Change
Fall
Semester, 2007 (TR 3:30-4:45)
Instuctor:
William B. Stiles <stileswb@muohio.edu>
An emerging understanding considers people not as separate, unitary
individuals but as mosaics or communities of different voices. These include
voices of our parents, our friends, our therapists, our favorite authors, our
goals and ambitions, and our fears and resentments.
Multiple voices within people can represent depth of resources and
flexibility or they can represent fragmentation and dissociation. The difference
may lie the strength of the links between the voices--the voices' ability to
enter into dialogue and to draw on each other as required in daily life.
Among theories of personality and psychotherapy, internal multiplicity is
represented, in such cognitive-behavioral concepts as automatic thoughts,
intrusive thoughts, self-talk, and self-statements; in such psychodynamic
concepts as internal objects, introjects, and states of mind; and in the
humanistic focus on contradictory aspects of self and unrealized potentials.
Multiple internal voices are central in dialogical accounts of the self and in
archetypal psychology, and they may be dramatically apparent in dissociative
phenomena and borderline states. Multiple I-positions are deliberately used in
the service of therapy and personal growth in the facilitation of reflective
thinking, in the analysis of reciprocal role procedures in cognitive analytic
therapy, and in empty chair work and two chair work in gestalt and
process-experiential therapy.
This capstone will offer an opportunity to explore the expanding
literature on internal multiplicity and dialogue.
Readings may be drawn from such authors as Hubert Hermans, Kenneth Gergen,
Mick Cooper, John Rowan, Mikael Leiman, Mary M.Watkins, Valentin N. Voloshinov,
Mikhail Bakhtin, Jeffery Young, Marsha Linehan, Giancarlo Dimaggio Giovanni
Liotti, C. A. Ross, Constantine
Sedikides, Miller Mair, and Dan McAdams. The
specific topics, readings, and activities will depend on the interests of class
members.